|
India's Most Wanted IT Brands
Continued from page: 5
Sunday, September 17, 2006
Power Conditioning Equipment, Enterprise All-in-Ones
Power Conditioning Equipment
Whether it was top of mind recall or likelihood of purchase, or even current
brand ownership, we saw a similar ranking for all the brands. APC followed by
Emerson, Numeric, Siemens, etc. The brand persuasion situation is similar across
all brands-high top of mind recall, but likelihood of buying not as high. Some
of the brands towards the bottom of the graph are slightly better off, but would
need to leverage this to gain mass in the market.
When we reach the next level, called the brand pull, then the situation is
not very encouraging. None of the brands seem to have much of a brand pull.
There are more switch-outs than switch- ins from competing brands. The brand
loyalty figures tell us the reason for the same.
CIOs didn't seem to have an answer on which brand to shift to from what they
own currently. While 63% of APC's existing customers preferred to remain with
APC, another 30% were unsure of which brand to really shift to. The remaining 7%
were fragmented amongst the rest of the key brands. Likewise, Emerson enjoyed a
brand loyalty of 73%, but another 23% were unsure and didn't have any plans to
shift to another brand. The remaining 4% said that they might move to Siemens.
Numeric enjoyed a similar 73% brand loyalty as Emerson, but 9% of its
existing customers were likely to move to APC, another 9% to Siemens, and yet
another 9% had no idea or plans of shifting. Coming to brand momentum, the
situation is similar to that in structured cabling. All brands need to have more
momentum in the market to ensure brand retention, increase pull, and attract new
customers.
 |
 |
 |
Highest
top of mind recall: APC
Highest current ownership: APC
Most likely to buy: APC |
On a relative scale, APC enjoys the highest brand momentum and current
ownership of all brands. It's followed by Emerson and Numeric in that order.
|
Brand Switch Matrix |
|
Future |
APC |
Emerson |
Numeric |
Compact |
Seimens |
DB |
Powerware |
| Current |
|
| APC |
63% |
2% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
| Emerson (Liebert) |
|
85% |
|
|
4% |
|
|
| Numeric/Merlin
Gerin |
9% |
|
73% |
|
9% |
|
|
| Compact |
|
|
|
57% |
|
|
|
| Seimens |
17% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
|
| DB Power |
33% |
|
|
|
|
50% |
|
| Powerware |
33% |
|
|
|
|
|
67% |
Enterprise All-in-Ones
The All-in-Ones or MFD market is largely shared by three key players-HP,
Canon, and Xerox. The rest of the players like Toshiba, Lexmark and Ricoh had
fairly low market penetration in comparison. The trend in this space is that HP
has a huge lead over the rest, as expected.
However, brand persuasion is still an issue with HP, Canon, and Xerox. The
top of mind recall for these brands is high, but an equal or higher numbers of
purchase intentions are lacking. Relatively, HP's slightly better off here as
it has an equal ratio between top of mind and intention to purchase in the next
six months. Xerox is relatively better off in brand persuasion than Canon as can
be seen from the graph.
When it comes to brand pull, Canon and Gestetner are slightly better off than
competition. The number of customers switching out from these brands was equal
to those switching in from competing brands. HP was at a slight disadvantage
with higher switch-outs than switch-ins.
There's no beating HP when it comes to brand loyalty. It enjoys 93% brand
loyalty, highest in the segment, with small percentages of its existing
customers saying that they're likley to shift to Xerox, Canon and Lexmark.
Xerox needs to watch out from HP, as 8% of its existing customers showed
intentions to shift. Canon, on the other hand, needs to be careful, because 17%
of its existing customers said that they might move to Xerox in the next six
months.
HP continues its stronghold on this market with the highest brand momentum as
well as having the largest chunk of the market.
 |
 |
 |
Highest
top of mind recall: HP
Highest current ownership: HP
Most likely to buy: HP |
Canon needs to work more towards building a higher customer base by encashing
on its current speed in the market. Likewise for Xerox, but it needs to pick up
more momentum. Lexmark has the momentum, but needs to encash it and build up its
user base. Toshiba needs to pick up momentum.
|
Brand
Switch Matrix |
|
Future |
HP |
Xerox |
Canon |
| Current |
|
| HP |
93% |
1% |
2% |
| Xerox |
8% |
20% |
|
| Canon |
|
17% |
|
| Verities |
|
|
67% |
Next Page : Customer Relationship Management, NotebooksPage(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
|