Increasingly, more organizations are realizing the power of IT, and are using it in
innovative ways. It’s no wonder then, that this time we received more than 250
projects for evaluation. These came from 22 different types of industries, ranging from
the usual mega-IT spenders like Govt, BFSI, manufacturing, petroleum, and IT/ITES to niche
ones like poultry, travel and tourism, real estate, construction, power and utility. With
so many projects, there was likely to be a lot of variety. We were able to identify 23
different types of projects, ranging from the usual IT infrastructure and ERP deployments
to projects like controlling appliances over the Internet, e-learning, mobility, security,
etc. Now that’s quite a mouthful, and it’s taken us many months of efforts to go
through all of them.
The Best IT Implementation awards are now four years old, and every year, the number of
nominations we get has been increasing by leaps and bounds. The process for the selecting
winners awards remains the same. We open up public nominations sometime in Feb-March
inviting everyone to nominate IT projects. This time, we sent out e-mail invites to more
than 2 Lakh people. There’s a defined qualification criteria for nominating a
project. For one, it should have become operational by the last financial year. Second,
the project’s benefits should be available to Indian audience, though the physical
infrastructure could be located anywhere in the world. Third, projects that were still in
a pilot stage were not considered for the awards.
We received more than 290 public nominations. The PCQuest team did one round of scrutiny and validation to eliminate invalid and duplicate entries. This brought down the total entries to 250. |
This time, we received more than 290 public nominations. We did one round of scrutiny
and validation to eliminate invalid and duplicate entries. This brought down the total
entries to 250. This entire list of 250 projects was then shared with the jury members.
They were requested to go through the same and provide us with their suggestions. They
were also requested to suggest the addition of any projects that we may have not received.
alt="Cs01_june2k7.jpg (14108 bytes)">
The project heads for all the 250 nominations were sent a detailed audit form to fill
up and send back to us. This is a questionnaire that collects detailed information on
background, concept, business case, people involved, project architecture, technologies
involved, consultants, timelines, financials, etc. Some of the information we collect in
this is marked as confidential and is not disclosed. We received back about 96 of these
audit forms. Here, entries that came in within the specified deadlines were considered
first, and for those that came late, we tried our best to incorporate them. Some of the
late entries were dropped at this stage. PCQuest then appointed an internal champion for
each of the projects. It was then the champion’s responsibility to understand the
project and present its case to the jury. For this, each project champion tried contacting
the heads of all projects assigned to understand the projects better and get details. The
champions spent a considerable amount of time travelling all over the country, meeting as
many project heads as possible and seeing the implementations in action. Again, some
projects were dropped because their documentation was incomplete and their project heads
were not reachable for comments. Some other projects were dropped due to confidentiality
issues. For the remaining, once the meetings and telecons were over, the team did another
round of scrutiny and validations to remove any further invalid entries. We found that
some projects were still in their pilot stage and could not be considered for awards. Some
dropped out due to confidentiality issues.
Once all the meetings and interactions were over, the PCQuest team sat together and
shortlisted the remaining projects to present to the jury. This year, 21 projects were
presented to the jury. The jury then decided the final winners. The jury has
representation from past year’s winners, IT users, and the IT industry. It’s
also free to recommend any additional awards.
The pages that follow cover all valid nominations we received. We start off with the
winners, followed by all the projects for which we’d received the filled up
questionnaire. We also interacted with some of the IT industry’s most respected CEOs,
COOs, and CIOs. They take us through the state of IT implementations in India, how
they’re moving their organizations forward using IT, and message to others on the
same.
We’d like to congratulate everyone for all the efforts they’re putting into
deploying IT projects, and we hope you enjoy reading this story as much as we enjoyed
creating it.
Adeesh Sharma, Anil Chopra, Anindya Roy, Manu Priyam, Rinku Tyagi, Sanjay
Majumder, Saurangshu Kanunjna and Swapnil Arora