Advertisment

Progress Report: Where have My Tech Predictions Reached?

author-image
PCQ Bureau
New Update

I've been running this column for almost a year now, with

the objective of looking at various competing technologies across different

streams and determining the best one. I made various predictions throughout the

year, and to end the year let's see how those technologies have fared! And

since, it wouldn't make sense to give a verdict on the topics for the past

four months, we'll only look at the technologies I talked about in the first

six months, ie, February to July.

Advertisment

Let's start off with my first column on Blu-Ray vs

HD-DVD, the two technologies that are competing to be heirs to the DVD-drives

throne. At that time (February), I said that the ball was in the court of Blu-Ray,

given its strong industry backing, but there were strong chances that both would

co-exist. As things stand today, Blu-Ray is ahead with more members backing it.

Some companies have even shifted over from the other side. However, that

doesn't mean that HD-DVD is dying. It's got some pretty big names along as

well, such as Toshiba, Intel and Microsoft. With so many big names fighting it

out in both camps, it's unlikely that either one will emerge victorious. So

chances are higher that they will co-exist, as drive manufacturers are

introducing products that can read both formats. The same thing happened with

DVD-Writers, so why not with this?

In March, I took up flash drives against hard drives, and

said that the former might replace the latter in the long run due to its high

speed, and quick access and retrieval of data. The jury is still out on that

one, because it's too early to comment about this.

Advertisment

Up next was the battle between short-range wireless

communication and Bluetooth-and Wireless USB, and ZigBee were the contenders.

Here, I said that Bluetooth is being squeezed between ZigBee from the bottom and

Wireless USB from the top, in terms of throughput. Unless it did something, it

would end up in a tight spot two years from that time. It looks as if they heard

us, because in the very next month (May) of publishing my column, the Bluetooth

Special Interest Group displayed its intent to work with the developers of

UltraWide Band Technology, to take Bluetooth technology to the next level. The

UWB group also responded positively, and even some pilot demos have happened.

Wireless USB products based on UWB are yet to appear in the market. I also

predicted that Bluetooth technology would be safe in the near future, which is

true till date. Products based on Bluetooth have only proliferated ever since.

In May, I took up the debate over which graphics would

dominate the desktop. Would it be onboard or would it get taken over by a

separate graphics cards? The prediction was that onboard graphics would become

more powerful, but lose a significant market share to external graphics cards.

While we don't have any market figures on that, the market suggests that

there's a lot of action in the gaming cards market. In June itself, we saw

machines based on the nVIDIA's SLI technology, which allows two graphics cards

to render graphics together on the same machine. ATi followed suite and launched

its CrossFire graphics cards, which provide the same functionality. So like we

said, onboard and external graphics will co-exist, this indeed seems to be

happening.

Next, I talked about the new security-appliances market,

and how it's giving software-based firewalls a run for their money. Our

verdict was that appliances are definitely in, but won't kill the

software-firewalls market. The prediction has been proving true so far. Not only

that the appliances have also become more feature rich to include VPNs,

anti-spam engines and much more than basic firewalls. More features and the ease

with which they can be deployed make them a lucrative option over their software

counterparts. This is challenging the software firewalls market and will

continue to do so.

Advertisment

Come to my July column-RFIDs vs smart cards. While this

does come as a surprise at first glance, it's not entirely impossible. At the

end of the day, both are contact less cards that communicate using radio

frequency. It's just that RFIDs have remained largely passive devices, ie they

have information stored, which can be retrieved with a reader. Smart cards, on

the other hand, have been active with a microcontroller, an OS and a RF antenna.

So they can perform computation of some logic if prompted. What's missing in

RFIDs is the microcontroller, so they can't really perform their own

computations. But if this were to happen, there wouldn't really be much

difference between the two technologies.  But

as we said, they both have plenty of opportunities in their own markets, so this

doesn't look likely.

Technology predictions are one area where many a stalwarts

have bitten the dust. I sure hope I am on the right track. If you have any

comments or suggestions, do post them at http:\\forums.pcquest. com under the

Tech & Trends thread.

Anil Chopra, Associate Editor

Advertisment