Advertisment

Structured Social Media and CRM — a Contradiction in Terms?

author-image
PCQ Bureau
New Update





http-equiv="Content-Type">











Advertisment





Advertisment

face="Verdana, sans-serif"> style="font-style: normal;">Andy

Mulholland, CTO,
color="#0000ff"> face="Verdana, sans-serif"> style="font-style: normal;">Capgemini face="Verdana, sans-serif">





I have
been meaning to get around to reading an IBM Research report entitled

' href="http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/ibv-social-crm-whitepaper.html">From

social

media to Social CRM'. In an illustration of social

networking this was highlighted by a colleague working on social CRM

to those of us who are registered as interested in this topic via our

Capgemini internal social network, in itself a useful example of the

power of social tools to help people share experiences, knowledge and

content without bombarding each other with emails.

The research

backed up what many practitioners will feel they have experienced

already with facts about how customers are using social networks to

learn about product experiences, but this is still pretty well

unconnected with the actual marketing of products. The report draws

the obvious conclusion about the need for a more structured approach

rather than the hit and miss of relationships of customers and

enterprises which all too often are centered on the complaints

department and make public all the wrong kind of messages!

Advertisment

Well, an

enterprise has internal IT so that's the structured end for sure,

but if you reflect on the value proposition of the external use of

social technologies and business use of social media then the

benefits are all about seizing unstructured opportunities. So the big

question is how do you go about doing this, and back to the headline,

how do you get the linkage between an enterprise's structured

internal IT and the unstructured but opportunity-rich series of

events and people that social media, networks, collaboration, etc

supports? At this stage I should warn you that this blog is not

focused on CRM but is focused on the challenge of enterprise

integration in supporting this issue.

I got

the

closest answer I have seen yet in terms of an enterprise-level major

technology vendor in Prague directly after Oracle OpenWorld when I

was invited to be the guest speaker at an internal Oracle event

training their European staff on the collection of capabilities that

make up Oracle WebCenter. This is nominally described as being part

of Oracle Fusion Middleware which provides the integration backbone

to support and connect both traditional IT and the four major parts

of Oracle WebCenter: Web Experience Management, Composite

Applications & Mash-Ups, Enterprise Content Management and Social

Networking & Collaboration.

I say

nominally

because the headings don't really convey how much there is 'in

the red stack' and most of all exactly what Oracle means by being a

full stack vendor in terms of some different and genuine business

benefits in this new area. This blog is about what we need and what

we gain from this, but it is well worth taking a closer look at some

of the Oracle content to gain a real feel for their thinking and

capability, so based on the event and talking to their key staff,

here's a recommended paper that is low on sales, and high on

insight:

Advertisment

href="http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2011/11-may/o31webcenter-353502.html"> lang="en-GB">Transforming

business processes in Social by Design style="font-size: 8pt;" size="1">. color="#ff0000"> lang="en-GB">

I suspect that many CIOs

react to Oracle's terminology 'a full stack' by thinking of

this in terms of technologies and products with the implied

technology lock-in and are rightly suspicious. This might be true in

the core IT back office, but when you get to the new world around the

front office the way Oracle uses the term is around process and event

integration moving through the stack of capabilities. If you get into

the detail it's pretty interesting, and lays out an approach to the

headline challenge that's worth reflecting on whatever your product

and vendor strategy.

Oracle

is

perhaps able to do this as I think it is alone in having the three

core blocks of business functionality as well as the underlying

technology to be able to make it function, for everyone else it's a

technology integration task in parallel to the process orchestration

and integration. That's not saying it can't be done, it can and

at Capgemini we are doing this, but it does give Oracle the

opportunity to provide a thought-provoking view on what good looks

like. So what are the three business blocks?

Clearly, the

new 'go-to-market' activities around Web-based social models,

content and interaction is the first, and the third is the ERP and

data engine. The second fits between these two and is often

overlooked even though it's just as important; best of breed

vertical sector specialist applications. Oracle has been buying, and

integrating specialist vendors in this market for some time, and if

you are successful in 'managing' your interactions with the

market, customers and experienced employees, it's specialized

vertical sector applications you are most likely to need to use to

actually capture the opportunities into process, and then on into the

transactions of core ERP to produce the structured data.

Interestingly,

the

big debate with the Oracle folks was about how specialized

vertical software crossed with horizontal software through common

user interfaces; the user experience had better be good or the

capabilities are not going to be usable. So that's why it's

interesting to take the time to understand the Oracle point of view

on 'the red stack' even if you are not an Oracle customer,

because it's really about a view of business process integration

across the stack from the one player with all three business blocks

as well as the enabling technology.



Advertisment