/pcq/media/media_files/2025/04/07/LoLXIvlC9bu7Dz0iP12J.png)
Samsung S25 Ultra Dilemma
Samsung S25 Ultra: When Samsung’s Crown Jewel Starts to Rust
It wasn’t long ago when every new Galaxy Ultra drop felt like a tectonic shift in the smartphone world. But 2025? It's a vibe-killer. Especially with the Galaxy S25 Ultra — a phone that’s supposed to scream "innovation," but ends up mumbling "meh."
We’re dissecting what went wrong with the S25 Ultra and why users — from long-time loyalists to industry reviewers — are calling this device a "huge letdown."
Same Shell, Less Soul
The S25 Ultra feels like a rehash of the S21 Ultra with a few cosmetic tweaks. Silver camera rings? Purely aesthetic. Worse, they’re dust magnets. The flat design was supposed to help ergonomics — instead, users find it harder to grip. It’s like Samsung tried too hard to be Apple, and forgot how to be Samsung.
S25 Ultra rocks an overclocked Snapdragon chip, sure. But 8GB of RAM in 2025? When phones like the Vivo X200 Pro and Xiaomi 15 Ultra come with 16GB options? That’s just embarrassing for a phone marketed as "Ultra." One angry forum user summed it up perfectly: “AI needs that. I need that.”
Same Sensor, Different Year
Samsung’s 200MP sensor has been the poster child for Ultra phones, but in the S25 Ultra, it’s more brag than bang. Reviewers noticed how image quality relies heavily on software magic — especially in low light, where the smaller sensor sizes of the 3X and 5X lenses show their limitations.
Here’s how competitors left Samsung in the dust:
-
Xiaomi: 1-inch sensor = better depth, cleaner low-light shots.
-
Vivo & Oppo: 1/1.28-inch and 1/1.4-inch sensors = superior periscope photography.
-
Samsung: 1/3.52-inch (3X) and 1/2.52-inch (5X) = soft, noisy images.
Street photographers and camera buffs? They’ve jumped ship.
Silicon-Carbon Is In. Li-Ion Is Out.
Other flagships are playing with cutting-edge battery tech — think 6,000mAh monsters and silicon-carbon chemistry. Meanwhile, the S25 Ultra clings to its 5,000mAh cell like it’s 2021.
Real-world result?
-
Vivo X200 Pro: Ends the day with 30–35% juice.
-
S25 Ultra: Hits red zone by 11 PM.
Charging? Still 1.5 hours. Compare that to 40 minutes on rival devices, and you can’t help but wonder: where’s the "Ultra" in this Ultra?
Bluetooth Removed. Creativity Disabled.
You know what made the Note series legendary? That S Pen magic — snapping photos remotely, controlling presentations, taking notes mid-call.
Samsung killed it. No Bluetooth S Pen in the S25 Ultra. No camera control. Just... drawing and tapping.
Oh, and want the black S Pen? That’ll be £50 extra. Fans noticed the black ones sold out first — maybe because nobody wanted the weird pastel options Samsung pushed. “Disgusting behavior,” one community post reads. And it’s not just drama — it’s a betrayal of long-time Note users who now feel orphaned.
S25 Ultra Looks... Familiar. Too Familiar.
You’d struggle to spot the difference between the S25 Ultra and, say, an S23 Ultra — unless you squint at the camera rings. The hardware design has stalled. Even Samsung’s own fans are comparing it to HTC’s final days: iterative, uninspired, safe.
The real gut punch? It doesn’t even feel like a Note anymore. Reviewers say the S25 Ultra is the first true step away from the Note identity — and they’re not thrilled about it. No 16GB RAM option. No powerful S Pen functionality. Just a tall, flat, generic phone with nothing to distinguish it from the crowd.
One UI 7: The Saving Grace?
Okay, let’s be fair — the software’s good. One UI 7 is snappy, clean, and customizable. Samsung nailed the anti-reflective display too. That combo is what stopped many users from rage-returning the phone within 48 hours.
Still, great software on a compromised device? That’s like dressing up an average pizza with premium olives. It's tasty, sure — but it doesn’t change what’s missing.
Return Rates Tell a Story
Several reviewers — even seasoned Android veterans — returned their S25 Ultra within a week. Why? Because there are better options in India and Asia, where Oppo, Xiaomi, and Vivo have finally outclassed Samsung on hardware.
One journalist put it bluntly: "This phone wasn’t made for us — it was made for someone walking into a store with a 3-year-old device and cash to burn."
That stings. Because Samsung used to define what Android excellence looked like.
Samsung Needs a Wake-Up Call
The Galaxy S25 Ultra isn’t a bad phone. But that’s not the point. When you buy an "Ultra," you’re expecting excellence — not excuses.
-
It doesn't lead in photography.
-
It doesn't top charts in performance or endurance.
-
It doesn’t feel premium in the ways that matter.
It plays it safe. Too safe. And in 2025, that’s the fastest way to lose your edge.
TL;DR — Here’s the Breakdown:
-
Same cameras, same battery, weaker S Pen.
-
8GB RAM in 2025? Come on.
-
Design evolution? Flatlined.
-
One UI 7 is the only real glow-up.
-
You’ll find better alternatives — if you look outside the Samsung bubble.
Hey Samsung — Your move.
It’s time to stop playing it safe. Because your fans? They remember the glory days. And they’re not impressed by silver rings and stripped-down styluses. They want bold. They want groundbreaking. They want Ultra.