Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13: Gaming Centric Versus Premium User Experience!

The Vivo X200 and the iQOO 13 have flagship-level performance features; however, they serve distinct user demands and tastes. Although they both provide flagship-level performance, the Vivo X200 and the iQOO 13 are made to meet different user needs and preferences. The Vivo X200 emphasises a well-rounded strategy, including camera capabilities,  design, and features for professionals and multimedia fans looking for a brilliant experience. By emphasizing high refresh rates, strong processing power, and cooling mechanisms to guarantee smooth operation during demanding tasks, the iQOO 13 suits gamers and performance-driven customers. Despite having similar hardware, the two handsets stand out in the flagship smartphone market due to their different priorities: gaming-centric optimizations versus premium user experience. Let's read about Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13 in this article!

Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13: Performance

iQOO 13: This 3nm CPU is perfect for demanding tasks like gaming because of its extremely low power consumption and high efficiency. With a dedicated Q2 performance chip that improves graphics and the overall gaming experience, the iQOO 13 is designed with gaming in mind.

Vivo X200: This chipset lowers GPU power consumption by 44% and boosts CPU performance by 28% over its predecessor. Significant improvements to the Neural Processing Unit (NPU) are also included for improved AI capabilities.

These phones differ significantly in performance; one has a MediaTek flagship, while the other has a Snapdragon flagship. The Snapdragon 8 Elite, a 3nm flagship chipset and one of the most potent on the market, powers the iQOO 13. In terms of raw performance, it is on par with the Snapdragon 8 Elite and even the Apple A18 Pro, and it competes with the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, which powers the Vivo X200, another 3nm chipset. Both phones include 512GB of internal storage and up to 16GB of RAM. Regarding the battery, the Vivo X200 has a 5800mAh battery that supports 90W wired charging, while the iQOO 13 has a 6000mAh battery in India that supports 120W wired charging.

Performance Differences

Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13: Design and Display

The 6.67-inch AMOLED screen of the Vivo X200 can reach a maximum brightness of 4500 nits. It offers 460 pixels per inch with a resolution of 1260 x 2800 pixels. A significantly larger 6.82-inch AMOLED screen with a refresh rate of 144 Hz and a maximum brightness of 4500 nits is featured in the iQOO 13. Five hundred ten pixels per inch are available. The iQOO 13's 144Hz screen gives it an advantage over the Vivo X200's 120Hz display regarding pixels per inch and refresh rate.

Regarding construction and design, both phones are composed of aluminum and glass. The 197-gram Vivo X200 has an IP68 and IP69 dust and water resistance rating. Although it weighs 207 grams more, the iQOO 13 is likewise composed of glass and aluminum and boasts IP68 and IP69 dust and water resistance.

Summary of Key Differences in Design and Display

Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13: Camera

With its Zeiss-powered optics, the Vivo X200 leads the field in cameras, which are, without a doubt, one of the most crucial features of any smartphone. A 50MP main wide camera, a 50MP 3x optical zoom camera, and a 50MP ultrawide camera make up the 50MP triple-camera configuration of the Vivo X200. It has a 32MP camera for selfies. A 50MP triple-camera configuration, comprising a 50MP wide camera, a 50MP telephoto 2x optical zoom camera, and a 50MP ultrawide shooter, is also available on the iQOO 13. It is a 32MP selfie camera. Despite the apparent similarities between the camera systems, the Vivo is renowned for its hybrid zoom and crisp portraiture, made possible by its partnership with Zeiss.

Vivo X200 vs. iQOO 13: Biometrics and Software

The iQOO 13: Fingerprint Scanner uses a 3D Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanner. This technology is typically considered better than optical scanners because it can function better in various lighting settings and is more secure because it can read a fingerprint's three-dimensional contours.

An optical under-display fingerprint scanner is a feature of the Vivo X200. Because optical scanners rely on the fingerprint's light reflection, they can be less dependable in low light than ultrasonic sensors, despite their effectiveness.

Compared to the optical fingerprint reader of the Vivo X200, the iQOO 13's ultrasonic fingerprint scanner offers superior security and performance.

Key Differences

Conclusion

To sum up, the Vivo X200 and the iQOO 13 have high-end designs and superior display technology suited to various user tastes. The iQOO 13 is perfect for gamers and media consumers who value display quality because of its superior resolution, refresh rate, and sophisticated dimming technology. In the meantime, the Vivo X200 is a serious challenger for outdoor use because of its higher peak brightness.